Unnecessary Curfew For Children Under The Age of Fifteen

June 6, 2019
Senseless Throwback Series

Originally Posted: May 1st, 2009

Curfew for children under the age of fifteen is unnecessary because it says that in the title. They do not need a curfew. If they did, children 15 and up would be stuck on the street late at night with only old people and we all know old people like to touch children 15 and up(remember Michael Jackson?).

Children are going to break the law no matter what, it’s in their nature. This is why I think children shouldn’t have a curfew. This is the first law they would break so they should get rid of this law and just let the kids get to the other laws already. They should be able to kill two laws with one stone.

If parents let their kids roam the streets later, they could save money by not having ot make dinner. They can also go to bed earlier and not have to stay up to make sure they get their homework done and other shit they’re supposed to do.

When I was younger, I didn’t have a curfew. Look at me now! I have my own website!!

0 votes